Deleuze, Benjamin and the Deterritorialisation of Film Subjectivity
Abstract
In this article I elaborate upon a virtually-unobserved point of similarly between the philosophies of Gilles Deleuze and Walter Benjamin – namely, their common cause on the revolutionary political significance of cinema as capable of scrambling conventional modes of experience. I argue that both philosophers view cinema as capable of soliciting a uniquely embodied and collective form of engagement, thus making possible a revolutionary disruption of conventional behaviour. This point of similarity, I argue, ought to figure more centrally to a comparison of the two philosophers’ views than their more superficial differences of opinion about which forms of cinema are capable of soliciting such subjective deterritorialisations. I subsequently identify a more substantial point of disagreement between the two thinkers in their different views regarding the temporality of these subjective modes: for Deleuze, cinematic subjectivity will point towards an always-displaced future; whereas for Benjamin, cinema makes possible a revolutionary rectification of the past.
Keywords
film, subjectivity, Marxism, deterritorialisation, messianism
Author Biography
Andrew Jampol-Petzinger
Andrew M. Jampol-Petzinger is a former Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Grand Valley State University. His first book, Deleuze, Kierkegaard and the Ethics of Selfhood appeared through Edinburgh University Press in 2022. Since then he has published articles on themes in contemporary Continental philosophy and Jewish thought, including research on the tradition of Jewish existentialism that constituted a “first wave” of Kierkegaard interpretation in France during the inter-war period. His most recent focus is on the role of philosophical rationality in shaping conditions of exclusion and persecution within and beyond the European context.