The Distribution of the Nonsensical and the Political Aesthetics of Humour
Abstract
Humour occupies a prominent position within the aesthetic conditions of contemporary culture, both in term of art and popular media. In this article, I consider how Jacques Rancière’s political aesthetic project can contribute to an assessment of the political potential of humour as an aesthetic of dissensus or consensus. To this end, I suggest a modified form of Rancière’s notion of the “distribution of the sensible,” which I refer to as the “distribution of the nonsensical,” as a means to analyse the extent to which particular acts of humour can be thought to challenge or reinforce existing understandings of sense and nonsense. I demonstrate the application of this model through a comparative analysis of Duchamp’s Fountain, and the performance work of Andy Kaufman and Jerry Seinfeld.
Author Biography
Nicholas Holm
Nicholas Holm is a Ph.D candidate in the Department of English and Cultural Studies at McMaster University, Canada. His dissertation examines the role of humour as an aesthetic site through which politics is shaped and enacted. His review of Ranciere's Aesthetics and its Discontents was recently published in Culture Machine, and he has forthcoming essays in The Journal of Popular Film and Television, AntePodium and Cultural Critique.